<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to use the Union statement with a dynamic order by</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:59:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nsayed</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/#comment-9524</link>
		<dc:creator>nsayed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 10:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/#comment-9524</guid>
		<description>thx alot i try this solution and worked well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx alot i try this solution and worked well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ss</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/#comment-9297</link>
		<dc:creator>ss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/#comment-9297</guid>
		<description>Hi, Thanks for this post ,
its good one but i need more detail form this query , am implementing Row_number()  function for paging purpose but its not working properly , kindly help me ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Thanks for this post ,<br />
its good one but i need more detail form this query , am implementing Row_number()  function for paging purpose but its not working properly , kindly help me ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WorldofCode</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>WorldofCode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>You will take a hit for using a derived table but it is much better than the alternative of having to use a temporary table.  I am using this approach against 30,000 records and haven&#039;t notice any slow downs.

Good Luck,

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will take a hit for using a derived table but it is much better than the alternative of having to use a temporary table.  I am using this approach against 30,000 records and haven&#8217;t notice any slow downs.</p>
<p>Good Luck,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivas</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Srinivas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldofcode.com/how-to-use-the-union-statement-with-a-dynamic-order-by/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Hi Friend,
Thank you so much for your post.
I had the same problem as yours and i found this article and i fixed this, 
But i have a question for you see if u can help. 
by creating a DerivedTableName on the fly will that effect on the performance of the query because i am returning 100 thousand records at a time.. 
Appreciated your help
srinivas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Friend,<br />
Thank you so much for your post.<br />
I had the same problem as yours and i found this article and i fixed this,<br />
But i have a question for you see if u can help.<br />
by creating a DerivedTableName on the fly will that effect on the performance of the query because i am returning 100 thousand records at a time..<br />
Appreciated your help<br />
srinivas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

